WinTel ain’t safe
I admire this piece not just for the anti-Windows aspect of it, but also for the sheer craft in writing. This is how you draw a reader in – grab him by the collar and drag him/her with you.
This is my first column written on a Mac – ever. Maybe I should have done it a long time ago, but I never said I was smart, just obstinate. I was a PC bigot. But now, I’ve had it. I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore. In the coming weeks I’m going to keep a diary of an experiment my company began at 6 p.m. April 29, 2005 – an experiment predicated on the hypothesis that the WinTel platform represents the greatest violation of the basic tenets of information security and has become a national economic security risk. I do not say this lightly, and I have never been a Microsoft basher, either. I never criticize a company without a fair bit of explanation, justification and supportive evidence. I have come to the belief that there is a much easier, more secure way to use computers. After having spent several years focusing my security work on Ma, Pa and the Corporate Clueless, I also have come to the conclusion that if I’m having such security problems, heaven help the 98% of humanity who merely want a computer for e-mail and multimedia. Even though I’m a security guy going on 22 years now, my day-to-day work is pretty much like everyone else’s. I live on laptops and use my desktops at home and the office for geeking and experimenting. My two day-to-day laptops (two, for 24/7 backup) are my business machines. I don’t need them to do a whole lot – except work reliably, which is why I am fed up with WinTel.

30. May 2005 at 03:38
Only idiots are plagued by spyware and viruses. Stop clicking OK and installing whatever pops up on your screen. Stop reading e-mails with suspicious subject lines or from people you don’t know. Use a pop-up blocking browser and a hardware router/firewall (or block your ports using the built-in TCP/IP filter module in Win2k/XP) and you will have no problems.
I can’t believe the author of that article is plague by crashes. I ran a VIA chipset with an ATI motherboard with Win 2k on my desktop PC for a few years. Not more than a few crashes over those 3 years. Once had 192 days uptime without a single crash.
Conversely, every time I have tried a Linux distro, I have had nothing but speed, stability, or hardware compatibility problems. And the last time I used a Mac, OS X (10.0) was so bad that I swore I would never use a Mac until OS XI (11.0) came out. By that time, they should have fixed all the bugs and design flaws (Finder).
30. May 2005 at 03:40
Rats, I meant an ATI video card. PRE-Catalyst All-in-Wonder 128. Most driver versions were fairly flaky.
31. May 2005 at 08:28
I know of lots of people who said there were issues with OS X 10.0, but who thought 10.3 (Jaguar, IIRC) fixed most of them. I doubt there’s anything we can do to help you with your Finder disagreements (even I have my qualms with it), but the platform seems to have grown more stable over the years.
Wish I could say the same for Windows, which has just languished for years now with only minor upgrades months after the fact…