<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Link Dump</title>
	<link>http://www.variousandsundry.com/2005/10/24/monday-link-dump-3/</link>
	<description>Wii, iPod, DVD, TV, and So Much More</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: GeorgeC</title>
		<link>http://www.variousandsundry.com/2005/10/24/monday-link-dump-3/#comment-11441</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 21:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.variousandsundry.com/2005/10/24/monday-link-dump-3/#comment-11441</guid>
					<description>OT:  Although I HATE Smallville with a passion, I can't deny that show has some good-looking women on it!

ComicsContinuum.com has some photos up of Erica Durance ("Lois Lane") from an upcoming episode where Lois goes undercover as a stripper.

(I read the Continuum, but don't follow the show).

Durance is EASILY the best-looking Lois Lane yet...  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT:  Although I HATE Smallville with a passion, I can&#8217;t deny that show has some good-looking women on it!</p>
<p>ComicsContinuum.com has some photos up of Erica Durance (&#8221;Lois Lane&#8221;) from an upcoming episode where Lois goes undercover as a stripper.</p>
<p>(I read the Continuum, but don&#8217;t follow the show).</p>
<p>Durance is EASILY the best-looking Lois Lane yet&#8230;  :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John C.</title>
		<link>http://www.variousandsundry.com/2005/10/24/monday-link-dump-3/#comment-11437</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.variousandsundry.com/2005/10/24/monday-link-dump-3/#comment-11437</guid>
					<description>Depends on how much May and Deacon (was it Deacon - I know one of the other two didn't partake?) liked being "Queen" again. I don't think the Paul Rodgers thing was intended to be permanent--just a way to get a tour off. No new songs, no big new album, and they had to let Rodgers do some of his hits as well. If the tour gave them a taste they want more of, I could easily see them signing on to a ROCKStar: Queen, especially of the new INXS tour/album do well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends on how much May and Deacon (was it Deacon - I know one of the other two didn&#8217;t partake?) liked being &#8220;Queen&#8221; again. I don&#8217;t think the Paul Rodgers thing was intended to be permanent&#8211;just a way to get a tour off. No new songs, no big new album, and they had to let Rodgers do some of his hits as well. If the tour gave them a taste they want more of, I could easily see them signing on to a ROCKStar: Queen, especially of the new INXS tour/album do well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.variousandsundry.com/2005/10/24/monday-link-dump-3/#comment-11431</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.variousandsundry.com/2005/10/24/monday-link-dump-3/#comment-11431</guid>
					<description>I don't think it'll be Queen, since what's left of them just finished touring with Bad Company's Paul Rodgers. Van Halen not doing it is too bad, since it's pretty unanimous they would be perfect for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll be Queen, since what&#8217;s left of them just finished touring with Bad Company&#8217;s Paul Rodgers. Van Halen not doing it is too bad, since it&#8217;s pretty unanimous they would be perfect for it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
