Archive for May, 2006

Monday Link Dump

Monday, May 22nd, 2006

* More “seamless” pictures.

* Never-built Russian architecture. Some beautiful stuff in there. Just fantastic, crazy, wild architecture. Reminds me a bit of Francois Schuiten’s work, too. (Via)

* Sound at different frequencies causes a table full of salt to assume different patterns. (Ibid)

* One man mathematically works out ways to save time on his commute. It’s multi-variable calculus in action, leading to conclusions that you and I could have seen coming a mile away. But he has the charts to back it up, now!

* Interesting step-by-step walkthrough by one designer creating a logo. I need to work on one someday for this website. And one for the podcast. And another one for the other podcast. And it’ll never happen. ::sigh::

* Nintendo stock soars post-E3. Sony’s does not.

* Seven minute streaming (ugh) video of new Zelda game. Looks pretty cool, although the camera p.o.v. blocks your view here and there.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Not keeping it simple, stupid

Sunday, May 21st, 2006

Caught an article on Slashdot this week with an interview of Amazon’s CTO. I must be reading too much about Web 2.0 and 37 Signal’s philosophy of keeping things simple, because this quote lept out at me:

If you hit the Amazon.com gateway page, the application calls more than 100 services to collect data and construct the page for you.

Is this something to be proud of? From an engineering/programming point of view, it’s amazing that Amazon can do that kind of thing that often. With all the customers they get and all the hits, their bandwidth and server load has to be through the roof.

If you’re like me, though, there are a lot of times you go to Amazon knowing what you want to buy. You saw someone talking about a book in a newspaper article or on another blog. (Shame on them for not linking directly to it! ;-) Or you saw a book in the bookstore, but weren’t in a rush for it, so figured on saving 20% or more by ordering it on-line.

You don’t need to see all the clutter on Amazon’s site to order that book. You don’t need their recommendations, their ListMania, their detailed information breaking down the publisher/page number/sales ranking, etc. You don’t need to see other books by that author, nor the author’s plog. You don’t need to search inside the book.

You just want to find the book, order it up, and move on with your life. It’s much simpler for you, the customer, that way, and it would save Amazon’s servers a great deal of load — something like 99 other processes.

Why not have a Simple.Amazon.com for this purpose? You wouldn’t use it all the time. Sure, there are still times when you go to the website without an idea of what specifically it is you’re ordering. In that case, it’s good to see other books about that topic, or by that author, or in the same category, or recommended by readers of it. OK, that’s still information overload, but I can understand Amazon’s business model. I’m sure some or all of those things are very effective. They’ve even helped me once or twice.

But there comes a time when there’s so much stuff on the page fighting for your attention that you fail to see any of it anymore. Even worse, it blocks you from efficiently doing what you went to that web site to do in the first place — buy a simple book. Yes, One-Click shopping is nice that way, but I don’t trust myself enough to enable it. I understand why there are three or four screens I have to go through to purchase a book and I’m OK with that. But can’t we make something simpler and cleaner-looking to order the book up in the first place?

Movie Trailer of the Weekend

Saturday, May 20th, 2006

How To Eat Fried Worms

C’mon, my fellow children of the 80s: We’ve all read that one, right? At the very least, we all watched the Saturday morning animated version of it, right? Was there an Afterschool Special based on the story, too? I’ve lost track.

VandS goes big media

Friday, May 19th, 2006

I was interviewed by a reporter with the L.A. Times last night for an article about Katharine McPhee. The story is now up:

Can a Sherman Oaks Girl Win American Idol? - Los Angeles Times

De Blieck Jr., who describes himself as “a TV geek with a blog,” has been keeping a close eye on “American Idol” since the first season.

It also turns out that I used “affects” instead of “effects” in my blog this week. Whoops. I always get those two confused.

Link Dump

Friday, May 19th, 2006

* A visual tutorial: How to play the spoons.

* Since ABC put their shows on-line to stream, people have done so over 3,000,000 times. That’s astounding, but it doesn’t mean the end of network television just yet. A large percentage of that number, I have no doubt, were people testing it out to see how it works. Come back in a few months and we’ll see how the numbers are then. If they’re still that high, then prepare for the shifts in television program distribution.

* CNN interviews Linux’s daddy, Linus Torvalds.

* If this isn’t real, it’s at least interesting: Wii Hide You Seek! It’s a massively multiplayer game of hide and seek with the Wii. If it’s not real, someone should hire the kid to help them create it.

* I have to echo Leander’s question in regards to the new Apple store opening in Manhattan tonight: How do they plan on keeping the glass clean? I suppose being open 24 hours a day will lead to enough foot traffic that it’s not like a graffiti “artist” will have unfettered access to the cube, but still. This is NYC. Where there’s a will, there’s a way. Let’s count down the days until one of the glass squares is properly vandalized. Will it be this weekend, or will they wait a month until the excitement has died down.

* And will Steve Jobs announce any new products at the opening tonight? Hmmm…

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Thursday Link Dump

Thursday, May 18th, 2006

* Seamless pictures. Mind-bending and pretty. (Via)

* Inspirational Linux Posters. Laugh out loud hilarious if you know just a little bit about Linux distributions. (”Slackware Linux: The very best 1995 has to offer.”)

* The right to bear arms. With wings. Funny pic.

* I never realized just how tiny the Wii console was until I saw this video of a disc ejecting from it. It’s also supposed to handle GameCube’s itty-bitty discs. I guess there’s a groove somewhere in the middle to insert that into? I don’t know yet.

* The new Apple Store opens in New York City tomorrow and looks nice. It’ll be open 24 hours a day, for all your iPod crash needs.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Star Wars Crap

Thursday, May 18th, 2006

OK, I’m definitely not buying the discs now. I’ll let Bill Hunt explain why:

My Two Cents - Archived Posts (5/17/06 - 5/3/06)

We’ve confirmed something today (directly with both Fox and Lucasfilm) that we’d begun to suspect… and it’s probably going to disappoint a lot of you. It certainly disappoints us here at The Bits. Those new DVD editions of the Star Wars films? The original theatrical versions of the films are going to be non-anamorphic (our original post on this indicated otherwise, but we have confirmed that the widescreen versions will be letterboxed only). What this likely means is that Lucasfilm has simply re-purposed the non-anamorphic transfers that were done for previous laserdisc and VHS releases of the “original” versions of the films.

After that, be sure to read Bill tearing Lucasfilm a new orifice in today’s post:

This notion that Lucasfilm is doing the fans a favor by finally giving them the original versions on DVD in 2006… but in 1993 laserdisc quality… is baloney. In fact, it’s unacceptable. Even though most of them probably don’t even know what anamorphic means on DVD, or why they should care about it, the fact remains that the fans are getting bilked.

When the announcement was made, I knew they weren’t going to go through all the digital cleanup necessary to make this a state of the art release. I would have settled for something just slightly sharper than my original widescreen VHS tapes. But making the movies non-anamorphic is insulting. George Lucas is now saving me money with his boneheaded business decisions.

Technorati Tags: , ,

AI5 - Round of 3 - Results

Thursday, May 18th, 2006

A bunch of things interesting in last night’s hour-long presentation:

* I really like Elliott now. Like me, he’s a diabetic who worked a pharmacy counter. And he’s a really nice guy who appreciated his town’s support. You hate to see people like that leave. He has a good enough voice that he’ll be doing something in the future with it, and he’ll probably take Mom along with him. Awww… He’s definitely gotten easier to look at through the competition, too. He’s practically a male model today compared to how he looked earlier in the season — something akin to a skinnier white-boy-from-the-hood Scott Savol.

* We have a Katharine/Taylor finale. For the first time in AI history, I’ll be happy with whoever wins at the end. In the past seasons, I’ve always has a horse to bet on. Even when I knew they didn’t stand a chance, I still preferred one over the other. (I still say Diana DeGarmo outsang Fantasia on the Idol song in the finale week, but I understand why Fantasia won. I just don’t prefer that particular style. And Fantasia wore out her welcome the fifth or sixth time she sang “Summertime,” too. But I digress…)

* Wow, are the votes close. Let’s do a little math, based on 50 million votes being cast. Elliott had 33.06% of the vote, or about 16,530,000. The second place finisher — they didn’t specify which order Katharine and Taylor fell — came in with 33.26% of the vote, or 16,630,000 votes. First place came in with 33.68%, or 16,840,000 votes.

Out of 50 MILLION votes cast, the different between first and third was 310,000 votes. That’s insane. With such a close vote, it’s anyone’s game. Now, it could happen that all of Elliott’s support with go to one side next week and they’ll be the overwhelming favorite. I think Taylor might get more of the vote than Katharine, but I don’t think it’ll be too overwhelming. I think we’re in for Reuben/Clay II here, where it’s a complete coin flip and it’ll be whoever’s supporters jam the phone lines most efficiently to win.

* That Ford commercial was like a really bad Weird Al parody. I was thinking “All About The Pentiums,” but that was a good video.

* I also have to wonder what the affects of being from the big city versus a small town are on voting patterns. Is Katharine hurt by being from LA, a town that’s hardly going to stop everything to rally in support of her? Are the small town Southern singers going to excite a larger fanbase based on local support and always win the day? After all, they’ve dominated this competition through five seasons. (I forget where Justin is from, but the rest of the finalists have been southerners. Katharine breaks that streak.)

Next week will be fun fun fun.

Rayman Raving Rabbids

Wednesday, May 17th, 2006

A trailer for another Nintendo Wii game. Yes, it does look like it could tiring. But it also looks like fun.


Technorati Tags: ,

Wednesday Link Dump

Wednesday, May 17th, 2006

* Freetar Hero is an attempt to port Guitar Hero to the PC, basically.

* If that’s not good enough for you, how about a program that allows you to play Guitar Hero on your PC? Just slide the GH disc in and you can play on your keyboard. (Thanks, Greg, for the link!)

* Oddities of the 24 clock. ‘1′ never turns to ‘2.’ Hunh.

* The complete Maniac Mansion - played in just over 7 minutes. I haven’t seen this game in probably close to 20 years now. Wow, that music was annoying. . .

* How’d they do that? Special stop-motion type digital video affects. They’re like bullet time on steroids.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

AI5 - Round of 3

Wednesday, May 17th, 2006

We’re almost there. Just another week. Just one more week of these writeups. My fingers are starting to feel the burn, but I can’t give up now. Do you see the contestants giving up? Heck, no! Although, honestly, a couple of them sounded a little worn out in their speaking voices, and I think it’s starting to affect some of their singing voices in very minor ways. AMERICAN IDOL is a marathon, and making it through that last week is the ultimate accomplishment. If you can do that with your voice intact, you’re a winner. Even Kelly Clarkson had lost her voice at the end of the much-shorter Season One competition.

The judges were as colorful (read: annoying) as ever. Ryan still refuses to shave more than once every third day, not that he has time in his schedule. And the audience continued to boo every negative comment. Onto the singers:

Elliott Yamin started with Clive’s pick, “Open Arms.” I didn’t like the sound of the screeching guitar through it, and Elliot came off sounding tired and just a bit scratchier than usual. He backfilled too much. I thought he was starting off softly so that he could ramp it up near the end and have a deafening crescendo. That didn’t happen.

His second song was picked for him by Paula, who can only ever discuss Elliott’s “love” and “funky white boy status.” “What You Won’t Do For Love” was a much better song selection for him, although it did seem a little more close to the original than other singers were doing last night. It was also during this song that I realized Elliott’s true calling: He needs to be the lead singer for a Maroon 5 knockoff tribute band. If he can add a slightly more nasal tone to his voce, he is Adam Levine.

The third song he chose for himself was “I Believe To My Soul,” which was an upbeat 70s funk thing, but otherwise followed a similar pattern to his second song.

I think Elliott is done this week — he didn’t crash and burn, and he didn’t shine. He didn’t have “the moment” he needed this week to save himself, like he did last week. He’s not going to inspire anyone outside of his existing fanbase to vote for him.

Moving on to Katharine McPhee now: Clive chose “I Believe I Can Fly” for her, which seemed like a good choice to me, though I loathe than song on many levels. For starters, I don’t ever want to be reminded of the existence of R. Kelly. Second, it used to play ad nauseum at the CVS I was working in during my college days. I used to do a pretty stellar impression of some of the sillier parts of the song, back in the day. In any case –

The song had a weird arrangement, which made it difficult to follow in some parts, helped not much by Katharine’s natural tendency to sing all around the melody. The judges jumped all over her for that again, though they didn’t seem to mind it as much when she did it in the second song. She emoted through the song well, and showed a lot more power than I thought she’d be able to at this stage of the competition.

Over The RainbowIt was her second song, chosen by Simon, that was the highlight of the season. He picked “Somewhere Over the Rainbow.” She should make it to the finals based on the votes she’ll get from that performance. It was spectacular. I got chills twice. She even started out a capella, which nobody had tried yet this season. Not since Kimberly Locke sang the song a dozen times on the show has anyone done it such justice. It was, indeed, as Simon pointed out, “her moment” and the best performance of the year so far. When we look back at this season, it’ll stand out along with Chris’ “Have You Ever Really Loved A Woman,” and a couple of others I can’t think of off the top of my head right now. We’ll have to come up with that list after the season is done, don’tcha think?

Her third song was “I Ain’t Got Nothin’ But The Blues.” I think McPhee is an old-school IDOL fangirl who missed not having a Big Band night this season, so she created one for herself, trying desperately to stay away from the Whitney/Celine/Mariah/XTina comparisons the judges love to shoot her down (wrongly) with. And if they hated her for singing around the melody in the past, you just know the judges cringed their way through this song. My notes have one phrase on them for this song: “Vocal gymnastics.” It was a perfect Mariah Carey impression: Every note in her range was hit in this song. It’s an upbeat little number, but since I didn’t recognize the song, I have no idea if she did it justice.

She also did a little strut dance in the beginning that I doubt anyone believed.

She should be safe this week, though. She didn’t screw anything up, and she’s got an amazing voice. If she learned to stop going off the melody so much, she’ll be stellar. (And if she corrects for that next week, the judges will whine that she didn’t make the song her own. UGH)

The only thing she needs to worry about is the Chris Daughtry fans holding it against her that she pushed through in lieu of him. But, then, all those people said last week they’d never watch IDOL again. And since there are no negative votes in this competition, they’d have to vote for two other people to punish the one they loathe. I don’t know where Chris’ votes are going this week, but I suspect more would go to Taylor, who’s already so far in the lead in this competition that it doesn’t matter for Katharine.

Taylor Hicks kept chanting “Soul Patrol” all night. Clive gave him Bruce Springsteen’s “Dancing In The Dark” to start, which Hicks was prodded to point out was the first Springsteen tune used on IDOL. Clive had to call Bruce personally to get permission. To me, it was a bit of an odd choice. Yes, Taylor’s voice is comparable to Bruce’s in many ways, except I can actually understand what Taylor is singing, and he doesn’t sound just like a third-rate Dylan impersonator. (Yes, I’m that one person in NJ who doesn’t worship “The Boss.”)

While Hicks had a good performance and didn’t miss notes or anything, it just seemed off to me a little bit. Maybe his voice needed to go a note lower or something, I don’t know. But it didn’t sound right. Maybe I associate the song too closely with Bruce’s voice? I know it’s the first time I ever listened to the lyrics, though. . .

Taylor did a cute thing, though, in letting Paula assume the Courtney Cox role from the video. Too bad they couldn’t sneak Cox in there as a celebrity in the audience. THAT would have been hilarious. Instead, we got Rosanne (she’s a blonde now, you know), Leeza Gibbons, and some kid from “High School Musical.”

Randy picked “You Are So Beautiful” for his second song, which is one a lot of people have been waiting to hear Taylor sing. I think it was a favorite for “Love Songs” week, as a matter of fact. It was Taylor’s best vocal of the night, in a very weird way. It was a very soft rendition of the song, much flatter than the original cover’s range. Taylor stood up there in his suit and practically made love to the mic for two or three minutes. He emoted. They’re learning all about that on the show this season, it seems.

All he needed to complete the song was to sit on the floor while singing it, but McPhee has the trademark on that particular move.

Finally, Taylor chose “Try A Little Tenderness.” What started out soft and gentle ended in a manic fit. Gleeful insanity rocked the stage. It was a classic Taylor performance. I was laughing out loud when he was done. Based on songs 2 and 3, he’s safe this week.

Elliott’s a goner, though DialIdol seems to think it’s razor close between Elliott and Katharine. If Katharine goes this week after Chris’ departure last week, then the whole season has been a waste. I’ll be grumpy along with all the women who are still swooning from last week’s loss.

No Repeats for ‘Lost’

Tuesday, May 16th, 2006

You don’t need to know about the rest of ABC’s fall schedule. You just need to know this:

No Repeats for ‘Lost’ - Los Angeles Times

“Lost” will return in the fall with seven original episodes, and then go on hiatus until January or February, when it will return to the Wednesday night schedule with original episodes until May.

ER is doing something similar, too.

I think someone at ABC just wants to kill IsLostARepeat.com.

Tuesday Link Dump

Tuesday, May 16th, 2006

* Last year’s Survivor, Tom Westman, is doing OK for himself.

* The new MacBook laptop is pretty nice for its $1100 price.

* The New Super Mario Bros. game comes out for the Nintendo DS today. Along with that comes its new web site. I’m waiting for the DS Lite before I consider purchasing it. Let’s see how I feel about it next month.

* “Typecast” is a documentary about Swiss font design. It’s played in theaters packed full of seats.

* This one is hilarious, and you all have Chris H to blame for me posting it: BBC did an interview with a guy named Guy for a segment on Apple v Apple. Problem is, they got the wrong guy. What follows is a minute and a half of life TV hilarity. Check out Dvorak’s blog for the video of this spectacle, and the story behind the story.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Siskel and Ebert being snippy

Tuesday, May 16th, 2006

This might be a little uncomfortable to watch, but it is interesting car crash theater:

reference tone: “Please Get It Together, Gene.”

Priceless out-takes of a word-slurring, out-of-it Gene Siskel and a pissed-off Roger Ebert taping promos in the 1980s.

The first one is the worst. The second one seems much more playful, as they discuss McDonalds at length. It’s fun to hear Siskel use, er, naughty language, too. The third one is curious — Siskel goes on about how the WASPs run the world and how we need to overturn the government. Ebert eggs him on with some hilarious religious commentary. Both swear their way through it.

Official The Weird Al Show news

Tuesday, May 16th, 2006

I know I mentioned it here before, but the DVD release this summer is now official:

Weird Al Show, The - Press Release for The Weird Al Show

The Weird Al Show: The Complete Series will brighten the day of legions of Weird Al’s fans when it arrives in stores on August 15th. The three-disc set contains all 13 hilarious episodes of the series which ran on CBS during the 1997-1998 television season. The discs include a plethora of entertaining bonus material, such as animation storyboards, original art galleries, and a karaoke version of the tongue-twisting theme song. Each episode features a commentary by Weird Al, producer Tom Frank and director Peyton Reed, plus guest commentaries from some of the cast members, including Judy Tenuta and Emo Philips.

Between this, TaleSpin, Animaniacs, and Pinky and the Brain, you’ll be able to program your own Saturday morning schedule with the releases of mid-summer.

Technorati Tags: , ,


breast pain after using vytorin breast pain caused by vytorin buy vytorin calcium supplement interaction with vytorin cigna formulary vytorin ck and effects of vytorin ck vytorin coplications from vytorin crestor vs vytorin cumulative effects of vytorin danger of vytorin dangers of vytorin data sheet of vytorin description of vytorin difference between zocor vytorin diflucan vytorin discount vytorin discount vytorin 10 20 gain vytorin weight generic alternitive for vytorin generic drug for vytorin generic equivalent for vytorin generic equivelant for vytorin generic for vytorin generic for vytorin 10 40 generic form of vytorin generic name for vytorin generic version of vytorin generic vytorin gout and vytorin grapefruit with vytorin half life of vytorin heart attacks and vytorin improve it vytorin info on the drug vytorin info on vytorin information about vytorin information on drug vytorin information on vytorin vytorin vytorin 10 vytorin 10 10 vytorin 10 20 vytorin 10 20 forum vytorin 10 20 mg vytorin 10 40 vytorin 10 40 mg vytorin 10 40 one a day vytorin 10 40 prices vytorin 10 40 side effects vytorin 10 40 tablet m s vytorin 10 80 vytorin 10 mg vytorin 10 mg drug vytorin 10 mg40 mg vytorin 10-10 vytorin 10-20 vytorin 10-20 mg vytorin 10-40 vytorin 10-40 prcies vytorin 1010 vytorin 40 40 vytorin 40 by 10 daily vytorin ace vytorin blood sugar vytorin body odor vytorin body pain vytorin caduet vytorin caffine lisinopril metformin vytorin canada vytorin cancer vytorin cardiovascular disease vytorin category vytorin nails hair vytorin neuropathy vytorin side-affects vytorin sideafects vytorin sideeffects vytorin skin rash itching vytorin sleep vytorin sleepiness vytorin stomach pains vytorin weight gain pain vytorin when to take vytorin with verelan vytorin worst pills vytorin wpwp vytorin zetia vytorin zetia zocor adderall emsam angry on emsam bipolar emsam buy emsam buy emsam online definition of emsam depression and emsam dietary restrictions for emsam discontinuing emsam patch doctor prescribes emsam emsam emsam 2005 emsam 6 mg patches emsam 6mg patch emsam 6mg patch drug interactions emsam 9mg femara femara 2.5 dosage femara 2.5 mg femara 2.5 mg film kapli tablet femara 2.5mg tablets femara adrenal fatigue femara and advanced breast cancer femara and allergies femara and anxiety femara and birth defects femara and blood stained cm femara and bone pain buy femara buy hoodia buy hoodia online order hoodia cheap hoodia order hoodia online order 50mg viagra order cheap viagra order cheap viagra fas order cialis and viagra order discount viagra order generic viagra order generic viagra online order mexican viagra order order viagra order phentermine onlineorder viagra order phizer viagra order prescription viagra order prescription viagra without order site viagra order status viagra order uk viagra order viagra 1 order viagra air travel order viagra buying viagr order viagra canada order viagra cheap order viagra here order viagra international ships order viagra now order viagra now money order viagra now viagra money order order viagra on line order viagra on-line order viagra online order viagra online consumer discount rx order viagra online no rx prescription order viagra online uk order viagra onlines order viagra or levitra order viagra overnight delivery order viagra overnight shipping order viagra prescription order viagra softtabs order viagra uk order viagra usa order viagra viagra order viagra viagra online order viagra visit your doctor online order viagra with mastercard order viagra with my checking account order viagra without prescription order zenegra viagra ordering generic viagra in canada ordering viagra online ordering viagra without prescription purchase and viagra soft purchase cheap viagra online purchase generic viagra purchase generic viagra online purchase generic viagra uk purchase of viagra purchase site viagra purchase viagra and cialis purchase viagra by check purchase viagra in australia purchase viagra in uk purchase viagra on line purchase viagra online purchase viagra professional purchase viagra soft tabs purchase viagra uk purchase viagra with pay pal purchase viagra without prescription purchasing viagra australia purchasing viagra in cancun purchasing viagra in mexico purchasing viagra in venezuela purchasing viagra online purchasing viagra online for cheap tramadol 100mg tramadol 100mg 180 tramadol 100mg fedex delivery tramadol 100mg us tramadol 100mg us pharmacy tramadol 10mgs tramadol 120 tramadol 120 cod tramadol 120 ea tramadol 120 ea cheap tramadol 120 ea cod tramadol 120 pills tramadol 120 pills sunday tramadol 120 quantity tramadol 120 tablets tramadol 120ct tramadol 150 tramadol 150 cod sat tramadol 150 ea tramadol 150 tablets tramadol 180 tramadol 180 3 00 tramadol 180 99 tramadol 180 cheap tramadol 180 cheap cod tramadol 180 cod tramadol 180 count for sale tramadol 180 ct 49 tramadol 180 ct cheap tramadol 180 fedex tramadol 180 fre overnight shipping 99.00 tramadol 180 overnight shipping tramadol 180 pills tramadol 180 pills $99 tramadol 180 priority overnight tramadol 180 saturday tramadol 180 tablet tramadol 180 tablets tramadol 180 tablets free fedex tramadol 180 tabs $99 free shipping tramadol 180 without tramadol 180ct tramadol 2 tramadol 200 tramadol 200 mg tramadol 200 tablets tramadol 200mg tramadol 24hour tramadol 25 mg amitriptyline tramadol 25mg amitriptyline tramadol 26 addiction tramadol 2b fedex tramadol 2bonline tramadol 2bprescription tramadol 300ct tramadol 300ct 50mg tramadol 300ct 50mg 118 no prescripion tramadol 300mg tramadol 32 tramadol 3319 ng ml tramadol 37.5 tramadol 377 tramadol 377 imprint tramadol 3d tramadol 3f tramadol 4 50mg tablets tramadol 4 50mg tablets overdose tramadol 400 pills tramadol 5 500 tramadol 50 tramadol 50 effects tramadol 50 hc tramadol 50 mg tramadol 50 mg 100 tablets tramadol 50 mg 377 tramadol 50 mg 400 tramadol 50 mg medication tramadol 50 mg overnight delivery tramadol 50 mg pliva 616 tramadol 50 mg pliva 616 ingredients tramadol 50 mg side effects tramadol 50 mg tab tramadol 50 mg tablet tramadol 50 mg tablets tramadol 50 mg tablets for dogs tramadol 50 mg tabs tramadol 50 mg tramadol tramadol 50 mg use with elderly tramadol 500mg tramadol 500mg information tramadol 500mg information pharmacology